SAST: The Best Practices for Secure Coding

SAST: The Best Practices for Secure Coding

SAST: The Best Practices for Secure Coding

SAST, or Static Application Security Testing, is like, your first line of defense against security vulnerabilities in your code. managed it security services provider Think of it as, well, a code review but done by a computer, okay? Its all about scanning your source code, byte code, or even binaries before you even deploy your app. managed services new york city (Pretty cool, huh?)


The best practices for SAST arent exactly rocket science, but a lot of developers, especially when theyre rushing to meet deadlines, tend to, you know, skip over them. managed service new york Which is a bad idea!

SAST: The Best Practices for Secure Coding - managed services new york city

  1. managed service new york
  2. managed it security services provider
  3. check
  4. managed service new york
  5. managed it security services provider
  6. check
  7. managed service new york
First off, you gotta integrate SAST into your SDLC – thats Software Development Life Cycle, for those not in the know. The earlier, the better. Like, ideally, youre running SAST checks with every commit or pull request. That way, you catch those pesky bugs early on, when theyre way easier (and cheaper!) to fix.


Next up, you absolutely need to configure your SAST tools correctly. Out-of-the-box settings are, like, rarely good enough. You gotta tailor them to your specific technology stack, your coding standards, and, most importantly, the types of vulnerabilities that are most relevant to your application.

SAST: The Best Practices for Secure Coding - managed services new york city

    Otherwise, youll be drowning in false positives, and nobody got time for that!


    Speaking of false positives, thats a HUGE problem with SAST. So, you gotta have a process for triaging and addressing them. Dont just ignore them! Thats how real vulnerabilities slip through the cracks. You need to investigate each finding, determine if its actually a problem, and either fix it or mark it as a false positive with a good explanation.


    And finally (but this is important!), you gotta make sure your developers actually understand the SAST findings and how to fix them. Running SAST tools is only half the battle. If your developers dont know why a particular piece of code is flagged as vulnerable or how to remediate it, then youre basically just wasting your money. check Training and education are key! managed it security services provider managed service new york You want them writing secure code from the start, not just fixing problems after the fact! Its a whole cultural shift, really!

    SAST: The Best Practices for Secure Coding