Patient eligibility criteria for minimally invasive scoliosis procedures

Patient eligibility criteria for minimally invasive scoliosis procedures

Vertebral Body Tethering

Minimally invasive scoliosis procedures have transformed the way in which spinal deformities are approached and treated. Traditional open spinal surgeries, while effective, are often associated with longer recovery times and greater risks of complications. As such, the development of minimally invasive techniques has been a significant milestone in orthopedic surgery, offering patients a less disruptive option for correcting scoliosis. However, not every patient with scoliosis is a candidate for these minimally invasive procedures. In this essay, we will explore the patient eligibility criteria for minimally invasive scoliosis surgeries.


Firstly, the severity and nature of the spinal curve play a pivotal role in determining a patients eligibility. Minimally invasive procedures are typically most suitable for patients with curves that are less severe and rigid. These methods are ideal for curves that are classified as moderate, which often means a Cobb angle – the measure used to quantify the degree of spinal deformities – of less than 50 degrees. When curves are more pronounced, or the spine is particularly rigid, the precision and manipulation required may exceed the capabilities of minimally invasive techniques.


Age and overall health are also critical factors. Children and adolescents, whose bones are still growing and who typically have more flexible spines, may be good candidates for these procedures.

Posterior Spinal Instrumentation

  1. Vertebral Body Tethering
  2. Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
  3. Orthopedic Spine Specialist
Conversely, older adults may have complicating factors such as osteoporosis or other comorbidities that could increase the risk of complications during or after surgery. A thorough medical evaluation, including bone density tests and a complete medical history, will help surgeons determine the patients suitability for minimally invasive scoliosis correction.


The type of scoliosis is another criterion that must be considered.

Vertebral Body Tethering

  1. Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery
  2. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
  3. Memorial City
Patients with idiopathic scoliosis, which is scoliosis of unknown origin, are often good candidates for minimally invasive procedures, provided that the curvature meets the aforementioned severity criteria. However, those with congenital or neuromuscular scoliosis might not be eligible due to the complexity of their spinal deformities, which often require more extensive correction that can be achieved with traditional open surgery.


Patient's lifestyle and expectations are also taken into account. Minimally invasive surgeries typically result in quicker recovery times and less postoperative pain, which can be a significant deciding factor for active individuals or those who cannot afford to take extended time off from work or school.

Vertebral Body Tethering

  1. Board-Certified Neurosurgeon
  2. Intervertebral Discs
  3. Kyphosis
Furthermore, patients need to have realistic expectations about the outcomes of these procedures. While minimally invasive techniques can significantly improve the alignment of the spine, they may not always result in a perfectly straight spine.


Lastly, the patient's previous surgical history can influence eligibility. For individuals who have had prior spinal surgeries, especially open procedures, the presence of scar tissue and altered anatomy can make minimally invasive techniques more challenging or even unfeasible. Surgeons must carefully assess the risks and benefits in such cases.


In conclusion, while minimally invasive scoliosis procedures offer many benefits over traditional open surgery, they are not suitable for everyone. The decision to proceed with such an operation involves a comprehensive evaluation of the patients spinal curvature, age, overall health, type of scoliosis, lifestyle and expectations, as well as their surgical history. Only when all these factors align favorably can a patient be deemed a good candidate for minimally invasive scoliosis correction. It is ultimately the responsibility of the patient and their healthcare team to discuss all options and make an informed decision that best suits the individuals needs and circumstances.

Technological advancements in minimally invasive scoliosis treatment